Civil Rights Violations

Reasonable Accommodation leading to Disability Discrimination:

I am required by law to say that term prior to even saying Hello and it is a royal pain to me to state it as it seems that many people that are not necessarily ignorant not stupid but unaware that the only way they can legally respond while living in the USA is “What is your Reasonable Accommodation” which in essence when those people that respond to me do not state it are violating my Civil Rights as they are not accepting what Title 111 of the ADA is>

I received a call today Wednesday October 29, 2014 10/29/2014 from

(941) 921 – 5581 and when I went to listen to the message there was nothing but heavy breathing on the message.  If I did not know that the call was from

Main Office

N&M Cool Today

6143 Clark Center Avenue

Sarasota, FL. 34238

(800) 226-2636 – Toll Free

(941) 921-5581 – Telephone

(941) 923-3642 – Fax

this company to determine if the Friday morning appointment for an estimate to have a generator put in was okay or had to be changed, I might have thought due to the heavy breathing that a PERVERT was calling me.  I called back and said Reasonable Accommodation and the lady that was on the phone Regina would not accept the Reasonable Accommodation statement as it is a Federal law.  But no, even when I told her what my US Social Security Disability was she took a confrontational stance with me while I read the Reasonable Accommodation Statement not my statement but a Federal law called Title 111 taken directly off of the Department of Justices website

http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/drs/

Within five minutes I contacted the company /manufacturer who set up the appointment my contact and still said the Reasonable Accommodation statement and just prior to doing a conference call I let my contact know that the company that left the heavy breathing on my voicemail that I had called to verify when my appointment was in the first place on:

10/24/2014 06:47PM            941.921.5581            SARASOTA  DT            33            0.00

Then I did the conference call with Regina.  Even when my contact was on the line as a buffer, Regina was confrontational and disregarded the term of Reasonable Accommodation and violated my Civil Rights and performed Disability Discrimination against myself and the ADA, a Federal law. 

My contact is getting me another local company that will not violate my Civil Rights while living and working in the United States of Sarasota.  No not a faux pas, but it seems that this is not the USA while I try to do business to spend my money living with this disability.

Per the ADA (Americans with Disabilities >FEDERAL< ACT) regulations. The Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice is responsible for the enforcement of Title III of the ADA. When any company or retailer fails to comply with any of the ADA public accommodation requirements, regardless of how minor or how severe the violation that retailer can be sued for disability discrimination via the DOJ first or an individual second.

I have a United States Social Security Disability Impairment Code 2940, which is a combination of Tourettes (use of Vulgar language) and Aspergers Syndrome.

I also have a documented sub – classification of IED (Intermittent Explosive Disorder) 132.34 – Verbal antagonistic outbursts which as the term intermittent means at any possible time wherein undue pressure is given due to real or perceived provocation. (In this case Regina was the protagonist) I may say something inappropriate, but that is documented as part of my US Social Security Disability, and it is not to be inferred as a danger to an employee

My doctors, and I find that the lack of interaction with people wherein people initiate the interaction with myself as an individual as one of the triggers that causes outbursts.

I am the one that has to live with this GD disability but I am getting tired of Urine Ants totally disregarding Federal laws at my expense.

Oh sweety, I didn’t forget little old you.  You violated my civil rights and you of all people at the Cochran Law Firm should know better.Get one of your motherfucker lawyers to read the following:
The following is the Department´s 1991 title III ADA regulation published July 26, 1991, which should continue to be used until March 14, 2011. The Department´s 2010 title III ADA regulation published September 15, 2010, should be used beginning March 15, 2011.


Sec.36.504 Relief.

(a) Authority of court. In a civil action under Sec.36.503, the court —

(1) May grant any equitable relief that such court considers to be appropriate, including, to the extent required by the Act or this part —

(i) Granting temporary, preliminary, or permanent relief;

(ii) Providing an auxiliary aid or service, modification of policy, practice, or procedure, or alternative method; and

(iii) Making facilities readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities;

(2) May award other relief as the court considers to be appropriate, including monetary damages to persons aggrieved when requested by the Attorney General; and

(3) May, to vindicate the public interest, assess a civil penalty against the entity in an amount

(i) Not exceeding $50,000 for a first violation occurring before September 29, 1999, and not exceeding $55,000 for a first violation occurring on or after September 29, 1999; and

(ii) Not exceeding $100,000 for any subsequent violation occurring before September 29, 1999, and not exceeding $110,000 for any subsequent violation occurring on or after September 29, 1999.

(b) Single violation. For purposes of paragraph (a) (3) of this section, in determining whether a first or subsequent violation has occurred, a determination in a single action, by judgment or settlement, that the covered entity has engaged in more than one discriminatory act shall be counted as a single violation.

(c) Punitive damages. For purposes of paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the terms “monetary damages” and “such other relief” do not include punitive damages.

The way I understand it will be discussed in a moment but a key note is that most people only violate my civil rights as they are totally unaware that the US Government actually classified one person with Vulgarity as their Disability without the legal ability to form the intent to get angry.  Bitch you fucked with the only person in the USA with this disability. 

Now before I decided to go to law school and get an LSAT registration number to attend, I had the ability to reason  and specifically in the section that is larger and in bold it does not say that any form of disability discrimination would not be open for room for retroactive recriminations prior to the enactment of the ADA in 1990, we can when I get my degree and license to practice revisit what I just said but on a more important note: 

What if It was quantifiable with Documentation to back it up that when anybody let alone you at the Cochran Law Firm were to violate my Civil Rights by as least as much of not accepting Reasonable Accommodation that there are physical changes in my body that could cause my Cortisol level to skyrocket and my thyroid to go off the charts, or my cholesterol to go from 89 one day to when I get antagonized to over 1100 and then back down to under 100 the following day, what if there was an addendum to the DSM 5  and the new DSM 6 that said that since I am the only one with this shit as my disability, what if that these changes put me on high alert for either a heart attack or a stroke, therefor I would fall under the Hate crime statute. 
Sweety all I have to do is have a prima facie case and facts proving what I just said and then you are royally fucked bitch.  Plus since this response was on the Cochran Law firms time they are also legally culpable.

Hell with revisiting when I get my license People v Flint 84:5034–5037., Flint tried without success as he had no documentation as I do that when he is antagonized he can be held in contempt of court and be jailed for his outbursts whereas when the Verbal Intermittent Explosive Disorder hits me I at that moment(s) am for that specific period of time not in control and therefore although I can still be taken into custody for telling a judge to go fuck themselves picture what will occur to the judges career when they find out that they have to apologize to me or they do not get to to keep their robes as I get let out of jail as in order for me to be in contempt or out of order I would have to be “IN Order” prior to the judge making the statement that I am in contempt.

I like the law as although William L Prosser father of all torts did not say the law is ever evolving I like my new career choice because any society’s laws must be able to adapt if that society is going to evolve and stay complicit or compliant with an ever-changing and growing citizen base.

If you quote me for anything what I just said was my and no one else epiphany.  Capiche