I will be sending you a long winded dissertation which may take around three to nine parts to get through, I am also sending copies to my attorneys, look at the word now plural as well I am getting ahead of myself.

 

 

Part one:

 

Since you are arbitrarily closing out our accounts and I do legally have a perception disability what is one to think?

 

Part two:

Do I write about the situations on my web pages for disability discrimination? Or do I as with press passes and privileges that is right I ACTUALLY DO HAVE PRESS PASSES AND PRIVILEGES. See Blue Cross and Blue Shield did something arbitrarily also to my wife and I, and I dug up, and that is before I had my press passes and privileges, information that the US Government either had a blind eye to what they were doing, or they actually like Enron were not aware of what they were doing, and after I dug up that info I gave it to my contacts in the US Government, blew the whistle on they.

 

 

Part 3

They got hit with over 20 million dollars in fines which in their case meant that they had to lay off some people, about 827 of them. You would not believe the amount of info I can dig up on any company that not I but some government entity would consider not kosher to how they do business for instance when anybody does say Reasonable Accommodation to any person in the USA, there actually is an appropriate legal response, a slight variation although two responses, on how you are legally supposed to respond to those two words which are also known as TITLE 111 OF THE ADA, A Federal law.

 

Part 4

See with those words actually being a federal law, I actually do believe that the person or company that goes out of their way to provoke myself can be a closet PEDOPHILE or a closet BIGOT and then I write about it on my web pages for disability discrimination.

 

Part 5

But writing about someone is the least of their problems now and although I have court orders that say I am not a danger to any company or person or to myself, besides writing about anybody or any company, extrapolate on what I am about to say: Normally when you sue any company for ADA violations only the attorneys make money. What if there was a new diagnosis that anytime that I do not on minor situations but with a perception disability determines when I get provoked, think of that you say hello and I think something else, then, it agitates myself so much that although I can force myself to most of the time to not let it bother myself, mentally, I can, however physically I cannot.

 

Part 6

 

So what I am saying is there is medical proof that when any situation causes myself to have per se a heart attack or stroke it becomes irreparable harm, not death but still irreparable harm which actually does fall under the HATE CRIME STATUTE. It does not matter that I can take magical and whimsical fairy dust to reverse the outcome on my system of those hate crime situations. All I have to do is take transient attack test one two or even three tests and then do a fourth or fifth test as an irrefutably, by the way the testing to say you either have AIDS or not, is also irrefutable, specifically in a court of law as many attorneys would try to say is there a one in a gazillion chance that the testing was potentially wrong, wrong.

 

Part 7

See now at this point I as an individual if I wanted to sue any of the companies that have caused myself deleteriously to suffer some form of physical damage, in addition to the attorneys, I too will benefit from some remuneration or compensation.

 

Part 8

 

Plus the individual or company will have the stamp of approval from the DOJ in that they can be charged with a hate crime which means no and do not pass go and collect $200. That new diagnosis has not been put into play just yet and if you are aware of the term Statute of Limitations, it specifically only applies to a given old has been tried situation. See with that new diagnosis, I could try a lawsuit for an underlying situation per se an employment law issue from something that occurred over 45 years ago, as all I would have to do is to show that situation still has an affect on my life from over as I just said from 45 years ago, today, which is not hard to do with that new diagnosis.

 

Part 9

 

When companies go out of their way to arbitrarily close out accounts of ours specifically like my wife’s JC Penney account if it effects her then it undoubtedly affects myself. What is one to think?

 

Part 10

 

You have been warned that I do not like to suffer from any situation even if I have several ways magical fairy dust or not to maybe potentially to reverse that situation.

 

Part 11

 

See what is the reason to pay back say an account like care credit or any of the other Synchrony Banks beside owing the money to be paid back, if Synchrony bank is going to make a prejudged assessment that we should not have those accounts in the first place. The reason I have been married for over 20 years is that you or at least I take the good along with the bad.

 

But no matter, you are going to do what you want even if it violates my civil rights in the process.

 

Part 12

 

See Barchay did the right thing by putting us on a limited arrangement to pay off with what we owed although they did close out our account in the process, they did not try to ruin our credit in the process. See I wrote about them on several occasions on how the House of Commons in the UK fined their company around 290 million pounds. Some very good investigative reporting went into that whistle blowing. I was not the person that blew that whistle on they.