– Justin – Mgr. Executive Response Team 8009551455
Reasonable Accommodation that led to Disability Discrimination and improper use of authority which seems to happen a lot by people who think that they do not live in the USA but rather in whatever locale they do live in:
I am required by law to say that term before even saying Hello and it is a royal pain to me to state it as it seems that many people that are not necessarily ignorant not stupid but unaware that the only way they can legally respond while living in the USA is “What is your Reasonable Accommodation” which in essence when those people that respond to me do not state it are violating my Civil Rights as they are not accepting what Title 111 of the ADA is.
So as you are reading this maybe you can grasp why I say Reasonable Accommodation prior to even saying hello but just in case that thought is not there, a semi-retired Secret Service Agent for the Department of Homeland Security at the Tampa FL field office of the Secret Service can explain to you that since I do not have a visible disability I must state the term of Reasonable Accommodation prior to even saying Hello, and that lies the heart of the problem, other than a few ADA compliant companies and many government employees and Senators and CongressMen/Women and their staff, nobody knows what the term of Reasonable Accommodation means and how they are legally complicit in responding. It is so easy to call your local LEO’s and say I am harassing you, problem is you do have to accept the term of Reasonable Accommodation as long as you live in the USA and have public access to your company or place of business.
Whenever I call any company I have a distinct problem I want to talk about however after Jason wasted 30 minutes of my time last night and 25 today. He Justin violated my civil rights and purposely disregarded the Federal law concerning the ADA. I read word for word what is written below as it was taken off of the DOJ site for ADA compliance. There is a spot that says
“shall give consideration to any good faith effort or attempt to comply with this part by the entity” good faith means when I deal with people they legally must make the attempt to respond with What is your reasonable accommodation when I say Reasonable Accommodation. They do not get a chance to do it the way that they want to. If that sounds threatening, too fucking bad. He antagonized me so much so that I still have problems with my account yet when I called back they will not accept the ADA or the term of Reasonable Accommodation.
Do not like the law go live in another country.
The following is the Department´s 1991 title III ADA regulation published July 26, 1991, which should continue to be used until March 14, 2011. The Department´s 2010 title III ADA regulation published September 15, 2010, should be used beginning March 15, 2011.
Sec.36.504 Relief.
(a) Authority of court. In a civil action under Sec.36.503, the court —
(1) May grant any equitable relief that such court considers to be appropriate, including, to the extent required by the Act or this part —
(i) Granting temporary, preliminary, or permanent relief;
(ii) Providing an auxiliary aid or service, modification of policy, practice, or procedure, or alternative method; and
(iii) Making facilities readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities;
(2) May award other relief as the court considers to be appropriate, including monetary damages to persons aggrieved when requested by the Attorney General; and
(3) May, to vindicate the public interest, assess a civil penalty against the entity in an amount
(i) Not exceeding $50,000 for a first violation occurring before September 29, 1999, and not exceeding $55,000 for a first violation occurring on or after September 29, 1999; and
(ii) Not exceeding $100,000 for any subsequent violation occurring before September 29, 1999, and not exceeding $110,000 for any subsequent violation occurring on or after September 29, 1999.
(b) Single violation. For purposes of paragraph (a) (3) of this section, in determining whether a first or subsequent violation has occurred, a determination in a single action, by judgment or settlement, that the covered entity has engaged in more than one discriminatory act shall be counted as a single violation.
(c) Punitive damages. For purposes of paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the terms “monetary damages” and “such other relief” do not include punitive damages.
(d) Judicial consideration. In a civil action under Sec.36.503, the court, when considering what amount of civil penalty, if any, is appropriate, shall give consideration to any good faith effort or attempt to comply with this part by the entity. In evaluating good faith, the court shall consider, among other factors it deems relevant, whether the entity could have reasonably anticipated the need for an appropriate type of auxiliary aid needed to accommodate the unique needs of a particular individual with a disability.
It is bad enough that I have to deal with people in the USA that do not accept that the US Government classified my protected Disability as a combination of Tourettes and Aspergers Syndrome, plus verbal Intermittent Explosive Disorder and that the only way I react to people when they violate my US Civil Rights is with disbelief and anger eloquated in the form of extreme vulgarity. Obscene, grotesque language which if they did not violate my Civil Rights in the 1st place I would not have reacted to them to start as my whole intent with any company I do business with is to “do business with them” regardless whether they like it or not. That in itself should not matter but the fact remains that many do not want to accept what my disability represents to them and they want to think that they have a choice to not do business with me and as long as I state that term “Reasonable Accommodation” prior to saying even Hello, that choice that they do not want to do business with me is taken away from them as they cannot base their decision to not do business with me on my disability.
These little people try to take the easy way out when my disability comes out by saying that I am threatening them when all they had to do was obey the law in the first place.
ibeleiveintheada2013 