Civil Rights Violations
Reasonable Accommodation leading to Disability Discrimination:
I am required by law to say that term prior to even saying Hello and it is a royal pain to me to state it as it seems that many people that are not necessarily ignorant not stupid but unaware that the only way they can legally respond while living in the USA is “What is your Reasonable Accommodation” which in essence when those people that respond to me do not state it are violating my Civil Rights as they are not accepting what Title 111 of the ADA is.
The following is the Department´s 1991 title III ADA regulation published July 26, 1991, which should continue to be used until March 14, 2011. The Department´s 2010 title III ADA regulation published September 15, 2010, should be used beginning March 15, 2011.
PART 36 — NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF DISABILITY BY PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS AND IN COMMERCIAL FACILITIES
Sec.36.504 Relief.
(a) Authority of court. In a civil action under Sec.36.503, the court —
(1) May grant any equitable relief that such court considers to be appropriate, including, to the extent required by the Act or this part
(2) May award other relief as the court considers to be appropriate, including monetary damages to persons aggrieved when requested by the Attorney General; and
(3) May, to vindicate the public interest, assess a civil penalty against the entity in an amount
(i) Not exceeding $50,000 for a first violation occurring before September 29, 1999, and not exceeding $55,000 for a first violation occurring on or after September 29, 1999; and
(ii) Not exceeding $100,000 for any subsequent violation occurring before September 29, 1999, and not exceeding $110,000 for any subsequent violation occurring on or after September 29, 1999.
My Reasonable Accommodation is for you or anyone to accept the Federal Edict that my Vulgar language when antagonized is my disability which as a US Social Security Disability is protected from little people who think they have the rights to call the police anytime they get the end product of my disability as if they were to accept the law then I would not have an outburst if they did not antagonize me in the first place. I do not have the ability to form the intent to get angry meaning I only get angry when antagonized when they (the little people) do not accept the Federal Law called the ADA.